


The technology is 100% good but the interface is assumning too much situations, and not let to avoid a lot of problems. Those are my thoughts after maybe 4000 videos processed. Because maybe the picture is clean… but with deinterlacing artifacts, or maybe is well upscaled, but the aspect ratio is not the right and the picture is squeezed. I go over how useful the software can be using the different models. The most popular versions among Topaz Enhance users are 2.3, 2.2 and 2.1. In this video, I go over Topaz Video AI 3.0 and see if its worth the upgrade. If we mix concepts, 50% of times the results are not improving the original. Topaz Enhance 2.3 can be downloaded from our software library for free. Topaz Video Enhance AI Version: 5.6. Topaz Video AI 3.1.1 (2023) PC Portable by 7997: Windows: 383 MB: : Topaz Video AI 3.2.8 圆4 RePack (& Portable) by TryRooM 05.2023, ENG Sony Vegas Pro: 410 MB: : Topaz Video Enhance AI 2.6. The deinterlace have to be only deinterlace) Download Topaz Video AI 3.3. I think the problem is the interface should show different stepsġ, input pixel aspect (if not 50% of times we are defforming)Ģ deinterlace (independent of enhancing method. If we have to deinterlace and upscale a video with grain we have to use Dione alghoryhtm that is so bad with the grain… And if we selet proteus or Artemis, the upscale is ok and the degrain is ok, but the deinterlace is destroying the results You are assuming that any video have one problem.īut 90% times the videos have a lot of problems. I want to explain better the issue with the deinterlace.
